Bruce Collins
I’m not one who easily embraces conspiracy theories. I try to keep an open mind though and I also do not easily dismiss beliefs. This causes me to want to dig deeper on a number of fascinating theories.
One of these objects of conjecture is the idea that the United States is still a colony of Britain. Before you laugh, consider the past and the present.
The Americans who arrived from England were British subjects. A subject owes permanent allegiance to the monarch (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914). The King expended his wealth to send his subjects to America.
The Declaration of Independence was a revolt for, in large part, taxation without representation. It was not a revolt over being subject to the King.
After the Revolutionary war was fought and Cornwallis surrendered to Washington, the Treaty of 1783 was agreed upon. You can ‘Google’ the Treaty of 1783 and find this document online. You’ll notice in the first paragraph that the King describes himself as the prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America. So, the Treaty was an agreement that granted more rights to the United States from the King.
Jonathon Williams, the nephew of Benjamin Franklin, allegedly wrote in his book Legions of Satan, published in 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington," a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown…the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire."
Furthermore, at the bottom of the Treaty, the three representatives of the United States- Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams- all signed their names as Esquires. What is an Esquire?
"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562
The representative of the King, David Hartley, was, obviously, also an Esquire.
In many of the articles of the Treaty, the King is giving up many of his rights in America. For instance, in article 3, the King gives the rights of fishing in America to Americans. How generous!
However, in article 1, the King has a claim to continue receiving gold and silver from his colony. How would he have the right to receive America’s gold and silver if he lost the war two years before in 1871? And, how is the King granting rights to the United States if he lost the Revolutionary war- unless there is some unseen agreement that happened to end the war?
Now, this is a very fascinating theory, which I found even more fascinating since reading Dr. Stanley Monteith’s book ‘Brotherhood of Darkness.’
Dr. Monteith has spent a lifetime researching clandestine societies who operate unbeknownst to the general public.
In a concluding chapter, titled The Final Secret, he writes," Professor Quigley discovered a copy of Cecil Rhodes’ ’Confession of Faith’ among Lord Milner’s papers. There Cecil Rhodes asked the rhetorical question: "
" ‘Why should we not form a secret society with but one object, the furtherance of the British empire…’ "
Was Hitler a brainwashed British agent? He was, says Greg Hallett in the book, ‘Hitler Was A British Agent.’ According to Hallett, Hitler’s grandmother was a maid in the Rothschild’s (interesting connection there) Vienna mansion. The story goes that Hitler’s father, Alois, was conceived in a satanic ritual rape.
Hallett claims that Hitler went to England between 1912 and 1913 to receive ‘training’ from the Illuminati. This trip is actually confirmed by his sister-in-law’s book, ‘The Memoirs Of Bridget Hitler’ (1979). Bridget reported Adolph was "completely wasted" upon his trip home from England.
As you will recall, in the Treaty of 1873 article 1 states that the King of England has a claim on the United States’ gold and silver. If you saw "America: Freedom to Fascism", movie producer Aaron Russo asks Ron Paul, one of the few politicians who gets it, about the gold in Fort Knox. Of course, most experts believe there is no gold in Fort Knox and that the Federal Reserve, a group of international bankers, has taken the gold of the US citizens. Mr. Paul confirms this and says that the Fed claims it is holding the gold for the treasury.
Russo also asks if Congress audits the Federal Reserve and Ron Paul answers that they do not. Then, Russo sums it all up by stating that the people’s gold may have been stolen out from under us and Ron Paul agrees that this is a definite possibility.
Who has America’s gold? Why did we purposely take ourselves off the gold standard?
Helena Lehman, pillar-of-enoch.com, has a good explanation of a theory that the antichrist is either Prince Charles or one of his offspring in her book, The Language of God in Prophecy. It is another sizeable column in itself but you can find an online explanation at this website: clydelewis.com/dis/prince/prince.html. I’m reminded of the statue that was built in South America for Prince Charles depicted as an angel with wings (fallen?) standing atop some skulls with the inscription,’ Savior Of The World.’
Jesus began his ministry at the age of thirty. Prince William will be the age of thirty in the year, 2012.
Lastly, I’m reminded of the conversation between Bush and Blair that happened over an open microphone. The media focused on the expletive dispelled by President Bush and limited the playback to about fifteen seconds. However, at the time, the entire conversation was available on youtube.com. You may still be able to find it.
Frankly, I was amazed that nobody else picked up on the entire conversation. At least, I never saw anyone comment on it.
However, if I can paraphrase, at the end of their conversation, Bush, with a mouthful of biscuit (literally), says," The MAN says that if Lebanon and Syria fall into place, everything else will fall into place."
At this point, Blair agrees and the conversation basically ends.
Who is the man who governs the policies of a joint British and United States operation?
Syndicate your Blog or Podcast with FeedBurner
No comments:
Post a Comment