Showing posts with label Prince Charles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prince Charles. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2011

COULD PRINCE CHARLES BE THE ANTICHRIST?

Here is an article from a few years ago that I thought I would repost, in light of Prince Charles making the statement that he is related to Vlad The Impaler. Some of the links are no longer active, though. It's pure speculation, but very interesting.

IMPORTANT WARNING ABOUT PRINCE CHARLES 

The following is a list of overwhelming evidence which supports the theory that Prince Charles is the Biblical Antichrist. Although at first glance, this claim may seem ridiculous, the facts speak for themselves. You owe it to yourself and your family to read this entire document before coming to a decision. What else can I say - You've been warned!

#1 - HIS NAME
Revelation 13:18 "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six". According to onomastics (the study of names) "Charles" literally means "man". In fact, the words "Charles" and "man" are interchangeable. So Revelation 13:18 could be interpreted as saying "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a CHARLES; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." The Antichrist is also described in Daniel 9:26 as 'the prince that shall come'. If Charles is the Antichrist, then the term 'prince' can be taken literally.

#2 - HIS NUMBER
According to Hebrew gematria his name adds up to 666 in both English and Hebrew (i.e., "Charles Prince of Wales" or "nasich Charles me Wales" - the values 1-9 are assigned to the first 9 letters of the alphabet, 10-90 for the next 9 letters, and 100-400 for the last four letters, (they only have 22 characters in the alphabet.) Using this system of math, and applying it to the first 22 characters of the English alphabet, (the last 4 letters equate to zero), we can calculate names in English just as you can calculate names in Hebrew.

#3a - HIS LINEAGE
Riddle of the Seven Kings, (the 3rd riddle): In the Book of Revelation, Chapter 17, Verses 10-11, it says, "There are seven kings. Five were, one is and one is to be. The Beast is the eighth and of the seven." There were seven emperors of the Holy Roman Empire named Charles, (check the World Book Encyclopedia). Prince Charles' lineage chart shows that he is descended, through his father, from the fifth emperor of the Holy Roman Empire named Charles, of the House of Hapsburg. Prince Charles is the eighth and, (by his lineage), he is also of the seven (SEE HIS LINEAGE CHART - www.dccsa.com/greatjoy/anti.html).

#3b - HIS LINEAGE
Since the Antichrist will attempt to impersonate the Messiah, he will have to claim to be a descendant of King David, of the house of Judah. It would be virtually impossible for any Jew alive today to prove that they were descended from King David. However, the same cannot be said for Prince Charles. In "The Illustrious Lineage of the Royal House Of Britain" (First Published in 1902 by The Covenant Publishing Co., Ltd., London, England), the authors easily trace his lineage back to David and beyond. The College of Heralds (London) has also traced Prince Charles to be the 145th direct descendant of King David. This claim was also made in May of last year in a documentary on Israeli television. Charles also claims descent from Islam's false prophet Mohammed. (SEE HIS LINEAGE CHART - www.dccsa.com/greatjoy/chart.html).

#4 - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE DOG, LION, & UNICORN
Prince Charles' coat of arms and crest was designed for him by the British College of Heraldry, using a system of guidelines over 500 years old. It contains ALL the Biblical symbols of the Antichrist. It has a dog supported by a roaring lion and a unicorn, (called a wild beast with a straight horn, a wild oxen, or 'little horn'). Psalms 22:19-21 describes these animals, with a prayer for deliverance... "Ps 22:19 But be not thou far from me, O LORD: O my strength, haste thee to help me. 20 Deliver my foul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog. 21 Save me from the lion's mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns. " (SEE HIS COAT OF ARMS - www.dccsa.com/greatjoy/crest.html).

#4b - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE BEAST
Revelation 13:2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion:
and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. The composite beast of Revelation 13:2, with the head of a lion, body of a leopard and feet of a bear is symbolic for other people--but not for Prince Charles. It is on his Coat of Arms. It represents the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire. These are the animal symbols for France, the leopard; Germany, the Bear; and England, the lion. These nations represented the western arm of the Holy Roman Empire. His Coat of Arms contains ten heraldic beasts, which is a first for the British Monarchy. All previous British Monarchs had either three or six, but none have ever had ten.

#4c - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE RED DRAGON
Revelation 13:2 also says, "And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority." The dragon is "symbolic" to others, but not to Prince Charles. He has a red dragon on his coat of arms. It comes from the flag of Wales, and it is in this title, Prince of Wales, that Charles is heir-apparent to the throne of Great Britain. At his coronation (investiture as Prince of Wales) in 1969, he sat on a chair with a large red dragon emblazoned on it. During the ceremony, his mother Queen Elizabeth II said, "This dragon gives you your power, your throne and your own authority." His response to her was, "I am now your Liege-man, and worthy of your earthly worship." Liege is an old English word meaning "Lord". "I am now your Lord-man, and worthy of your earthly worship." Another reference to the red dragon is in Revelation 12:3. "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads". Prince Charles is the ONLY person in the world to whom "And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority" can literally be applied to!

#4d - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE ORDER OF THE GARTER
Another symbol on Prince Charles' Coat of Arms is that of The Order of the Garter. The Order of the Garter is the parent organization over Free Masonry, worldwide. When a man becomes a 33rd Degree Mason, he swears allegiance to that organization, and thereby to Prince Charles. According to "The 'Morals and Dogma' of the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Freemasonry" written by Albert Pike (Grand Commander, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, July 14, 1889) Lucifer is the GOD of Freemasonry (see page 321 of the 1942 edition). On page 819 you will find just one example of why there are many people in Freemasonry who believe that it is natural to be a Christian and a Mason. Masonry intentionally misleads the low degree initiates and hides the truth that the god of Freemasonry is Lucifer, except to those in the 30th and higher degrees. "The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are on display there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them." Further proof of Lucifer worshipping amongst Freemason can be seen in how they measure the year. For instance the year 1998 (up until September) is according to freemasonry the year 5997 AL (that is 5997 anno Lucifer).

#4e - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - OTHER SIGNS
The chain on the unicorn is loose, all previous coats of arms show it attached (see II Thessalonians 2:6). Inner motto reads "Evil on him who thinks evil". Lower motto reads "I serve", "Service is something that you give to people, particularly if they want you to - but sometimes if they don't"

#5 - THE MARK OF THE BEAST
Revelation 13:16 "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads." On March 6th, 1996 on CNN, Prince Charles showed the world that he and his two sons William and Harry, had been the first people to be voluntarily implanted with a microchip (traceable biochip) in their right hands, allegedly for security purposes.

#6a - ONE WORLD RELIGION - THE RELIGION OF THE ANTICHRIST
On June 26th 1994, Charles announced that when he becomes king he will relinquish the monarch's role as head of the Church of England. He said he would rather be seen as "defender of the faiths," rather than "defender of the faith." "I happen to believe that the Catholic subjects of the sovereign are as important [as the Protestants], not to mention the Islamic, Hindu, and Zoroastrian," he told the independent Television network. There are currently at least two biographies available on Charles that describe his desire to unite all the world's religions 'in order for peace' (see Daniel 11:37).

#6b - ONE WORLD RELIGION - CHARLES CONVERTS TO ISLAM?
Various reports have appeared in London and Arab newspapers over the last few years, claiming that Charles has converted to Islam. This supposedly took place when he met with the mufti of Cyprus, Shaykh Nazim Adil (in 1993). Now while there's no actual evidence to prove that he has converted to Islam, there is no evidence to prove that he hasn't. In fact his lecture delivered in February 1994 at Oxford extolling the virtues of Islam, his frequent visits to Islamic holy places, his dedication of a South London mosque, outfitted in traditional Sunnah attire; and his 1993 trip to see the Quran of Sayiddina `Uthman (in Tashkent, Uzbekistan) with Shaykh Hisham Kabbani, only lend credence to the claim. Of course, this is just the sort of tactic to expect from the Antichrist. That is to say, if he were to openly come out and say that he had converted to Islam, this would make many Jews wary of him. Whereas, if he were to spread rumors that he was a Muslim, and not publicly deny them, then he could get Muslims on his side whilst not alienating Jews.

#7 - JACOB'S PILLAR (THE STONE OF DESTINY)
On June 2nd 1953, with the Knights of the Garter carrying and holding the canopy over her head, Elizabeth II was anointed and crowned as "Queen of thy people Israel". Both Prince Charles and his mother believe that the throne upon which the queen was crowned, the famous coronation chair at Westminster Abbey in London, is the rightful throne of King David. One of the reasons for this is because up until recently it contained a 336 pound stone known as Jacob's Pillar (also referred to as Jacob's head-rest, the stone of Scone, or the stone of destiny). For more information on the significance of this stone see Genesis 28:18. Legend has it that Jeremiah transported it to Ireland where it was used as a coronation stone. It was then brought to Scotland where it was used for a millenium to crown Scottish Kings. In 1296, Edward I stole the stone and took it to England, where it was placed in Westminster Abbey, and used since 1308 for English coronations. On St Andrews Day, 30th November 1996, on Queen Elizabeth's orders, the stone was taken back to Scotland and installed in Edinburgh Castle. I (as do many people) believe that this stone will be used to crown the Antichrist (posing as the Messiah). (See also Ezekiel 21:27, Genesis 49:10, Daniel 9:24, and Ezekiel 37:22).

#8 - THE ASSASSINATION OF PRINCESS DIANA
The Pont de l'Alma tunnel, the site where Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were assassinated has great occultic significance. The site is ancient, dating back to the time of the Merovingian kings (ca. 500 - 751 AD), and before. In pre-Christian times, the Pont de l'Alma was an underground chamber and used as a pagan sacrificial site. The Founder of the Merovingian dynasty was Merovaeus, said to be descended from the union of a sea creature and a French queen. Merovaeus followed the pagan cult of Diana. In Middle English, "soul" (Alma) has as etymology "descended from the sea." "Pont," has as a Latin root "pontifex," meaning a Roman high priest. (See also pons, pontis -- bridge; passage.) " One translation of Pont de l'Alma would be "bridge of the soul." If Charles is the Antichrist, then I wonder what Diana would have had to say (had she lived) when he declares himself the Messiah, and how many people would've taken her opinion into consideration before believing his claims!

#9 - THE PRIORY OF SION & THE MEROVINGIANS
Many blasphemous European royalty, including Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth II, claim to be of the Blood line of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. According to the lie, Jesus didn't die on the cross and rise from the dead. Instead they claim he married Mary Magdalene and fathered a number of children. This bloodline is referred to as the "Holy Grail", with those possessing it believing themselves the rightful heirs to the throne of Jerusalem. They believe that a new king of "the Holy Seed of David" will preside over the "Masonic kingdom" of Israel and the world. Prince Charles' link to the non-existent bloodline of Christ is through the Merovingian Kings of France. He is allegedly descended from the Merovingian Hildegarde. Princess Diana's Bloodline can also be traced back to the Merovingians. This is why Prince Philip selected her.

If the above examples aren't enough to convince you then here are a few more facts to take into consideration ...

- Prince Charles is heir to the highest ranking office on earth to be attained solely by birthright.

- Israel became a state in 1948. Prince Charles was born in 1948.

- In 1992 (just before the full unification in 1993) Charles applied to the EU (European Union) to be made King of Europe. He was turned down by European parliament, but has since developed enormous support among European royalty and the moneyed elite.

- Prince Charles' own business forum web site is at www.oneworld.net. His World Business Forum comprises 200 of the world's top corporate leaders and consolidates 26% of the world's wealth. Charles is literally able to steer the environmental ethics & business agendas of the world's most powerful multinational companies. The holdings of the House of Windsor constitute enormous wealth including the Archer-Daniel's-Midland company (they are stockholders with controlling interest) which controls 75% of the world's grain. In times of famine, the royal family will literally be able to control who eats and who starves.

- Prince Charles considers himself to be psychic and believes in guidance from the spirit realm. The Queen (also involved in spiritism) and Prince Philip both believe that Charles, "is the Chosen One - placed in line for the throne through a divine, preordained plan."

- In 1977, Charles went to Ghana, Africa where he claimed to have had a mystical experience. The news reports quoted him as saying that it was like, "St. Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus."

- One of Prince Charles' key men is the Canadian Maurice Strong. Strong is a top Illuminati operative and head of many world organizations. He has been under secretary of the UN for many years. He headed up the Rio Summit, World Conservation Bank, World Economic Forum, UN Commission on Global governance. He is also chairman of the Earth Council and the World Resources Institute and has been a top player in Planetary Citizens, the World Future Society, Aspen Institute, Business Council for Sustainable Development, Lindisfarne Association, World Federation of United Nations Associations, the Club of Rome, and about 30 other major organizations to name but a few of his powerful connections.

- To give you some idea of Charles' influence: He is behind three of the most important documents of this decade, the UN's Global Security Program (he personally initiated the United Nations Global Security Program), the 7 Year Oslo Accord, and the Rio Summit's `Agenda 21'. Up until recently he headed the United World Colleges, he is credited with instigating alternative medicine, and with the success of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio De Janeiro.

- According to an article which appeared in the London Times on July 15th, 1998, titled "The Charles And Tony Show" many Britons are becoming concerned about Prince Charles' meddling in the daily political affairs of the Tony Blair government. To quote the article "Charles' involvement is causing considerable controversy in certain British quarters, who claim that he is over-stepping the bounds of publicly allowable behavior by a member of the Royal Family, in daily political events.

- In the early 1990's representatives of Israel and the Palestinians were invited to a secret meeting in London, during which it was decided to try secret negotiations in Oslo, Norway. The Israelis were represented by Yitzchak Rabin, and the Palestinians were represented by King Hussein of Jordan (both 33rd degree masons). The third party at that meeting was Lord Victor Mischcon (also a 33rd degree mason), and personal attorney for Prince Charles.

- Prince Charles attended the funeral of Yitzchak Rabin. Within two hours after the funeral, according to the Jerusalem Post, Prince Charles was in Prime Minister Shimon Peres' office "insisting" that he attend a meeting at the Orient House, (in the Palestinian sector of Jerusalem), to begin negotiations to give back the Golan Heights to Syria.

- An article appeared in the Sunday Mirror on August 31, 1997 (only hours before Princess Diana was assassinated). It was titled "Queen To Strip Harrods of Its Royal Quest" (by Andrew Golden). To quote the article "Prince Philip, in particular, has made no secret as to how he feels about his daughter-in-law's latest man, referring to Dodi as an `oily bed-hopper." "He's been banging on about his contempt for Dodi and how he is undesirable as a future stepfather to William and Harry. Diana has been told in no uncertain terms about the consequences should she continue the relationship with the Fayed boy. Options must include possible exile, although that would be very difficult, as when all is said and done, she is the mother of the future King of England."

- According to Prince Charles "I am sure that many people consider that the United Kingdom is in an ideal geographical and historical position to act as an interpreter and mediator between the United States and Europe."

- In 1991, as his son William was undergoing emergency surgery for a near-fatal head wound, "Prince Charles left the hospital to go to Covent Garden Opera House, where he was to host a party of European Community officials.

- To truly understand Charles, it is important to understand his father, Prince Philip. Philip is a eugenicist who wants reduce the population of this planet from a current level of about 5.3 billions persons, to much less than 1 billion within the next two generations. To quote Prince Philip "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation." And Philip is off to a flying start. He is the head of the World Wildlife Fund (Worldwide Fund for Nature) an organization whose policies are not only responsible for the extinction of many species of animals, but also for the deaths of literally millions of sub-Saharan Africans. Although Philip Pretends to be a champion on endangered species, in January 1961, a few months before he would launch the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Prince Philip went on a royal tour of India where he not only shot and killed an Indian tiger (check news archives for the photo), but also an exceedingly rare Indian rhinoceros. Only 250 were then left in the world, but that didn't stop Philip from shooting it. The dead rhino's terrified calf managed to escape, but probably died later as it was so young. In a May 18th, 1990 address to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Prince Philip asserted: ``it is now apparent that the ecological pragmatism of the so-called pagan religions, such as that of the American Indians, the Polynesians, and the Australian Aborigines, was a great deal more realistic in terms of conservation ethics than the more intellectual monotheistic philosophies of the revealed religions.'' (Like father, like son!)

- Prince Charles may seem like a wimp, however he is quite athletic, an expert horseman, a qualified jet fighter pilot in the Royal Air Force, a qualified helicopter pilot in the Royal Navy, and a senior military officer in all three branches of armed services.

- Some of the rumors to have dogged Charles over the years include homosexuality, adultery, occultic practices, and spiritualist worship.

- No one else on Earth has the religious, political, financial, historic, and other ties that Charles has!

- Prince Charles' media exposure has exceeded that of any other man in history!

- Only the true Antichrist can fulfill every Biblical prophecy (WITHOUT EXCEPTION) related to the Antichrist. Daniel 9:26-27 clearly states that he Antichrist must be a prominent ruler, (presumably a prince of Roman lineage)!

- If Charles is the Antichrist, then he should receive a fatal head wound sometime in the near future. A fatal head wound from which he will miraculously recover!

There are many more so called coincidences, but don't take my word for it, read your bible, go to your library, lookup old newspapers, and keep an eye on the so-called Royal family. Still not convinced, then read 2Thessalonians 2:9-2:12 ...

Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

For more information read AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea by Tim Cohen

Visit Tim's website at prophecyhouse.com


Share/Save/Bookmark

Friday, October 28, 2011

Prince Charles says he's related to Vlad the Impaler, a.k.a. Dracula

Prince Charles is claiming that he’s related to Dracula. “The genealogy shows that I am descended from Vlad the Impaler,” Charles said. Vlad the Impaler was also known as Dracula.

Read the entire article here 

 Here is an article from a few years ago that I thought I would repost, in light of Prince Charles making the statement that he is related to Vlad The Impaler. Some of the links are no longer active, though. It's pure speculation, but very interesting.
COULD PRINCE CHARLES BE THE ANTICHRIST?


Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, April 23, 2007

Harry ‘the mother of all targets’ in Iraq


Here is some crazy conjecture that I can't help but wonder about. As soon as I saw this story, I immediately thought of this scenario:
If you read my post "Could Prince Charles Be The AntiChrist", notice the passage from Revelation 13:3 about the AntiChrist's deadly wound being healed. Why would Osama Bin Laden target Prince Harry? Notice that the article also mentions that Prince Harry is entitled to everything that Prince Charles has. Maybe we are looking at the wrong person. This is all just speculation that came to me when I read the CTD article. Just some food for thought, but I can't help making the connections.

Harry to go to Iraq
Prince Harry is trained as a troop leader to take command of four Scimitar armoured reconnaissance vehicles and will be deployed in Iraq alongside 11 men who will serve under him.
(AFP/Pool/File)

The scale of risk facing Prince Harry when he goes to Iraq is revealed in a remarkable series of exclusive interviews with insurgent leaders on both sides.

By Mark Townsend
April 23, 2007

(SUNDAY OBSERVER) — Prince Harry was left under no illusions of his value as a scalp for Iraqi insurgents. Even so, senior military officers could never have predicted the sheer scale of and nature of the threats lying in wait.

Iraqi militia groups have already hatched detailed plans to seize him as a hostage when he arrives in Iraq next month. In a remarkable series of interviews, some of the most notorious paramilitary factions in southern Iraq claim that informants placed inside British military barracks in Iraq have received orders to ‘track’ the movements of the third in line to the throne.

The claims again question the Ministry of Defence’s decision to allow Harry to serve in Iraq where he and his unit will be seen as a valuable target to those attacking US and British forces.

Last night a Ministry of Defence spokesman said: ‘We have not concealed the fact that he is going out there and the bad guys know that he’s coming and we expect that they will consider him a high-profile scalp.’ Despite the threats, Whitehall officials ruled out the possibility of the prince not being sent to Maysan, the most volatile province in southern Iraq, where attacks against British forces are mounting.

He will serve with his regiment, the Blues and Royals, for a six-month tour of duty. He is trained as a troop leader to take command of four Scimitar armoured reconnaissance vehicles and will be deployed in Iraq alongside 11 men who will serve under him.

One senior army officer who has completed three tours of duty in Basra, confirmed yesterday that Harry’s imminent arrival in Iraq was causing ‘disquiet at senior levels’ within the military. He warned that those around him, particular those under Harry’s direct command, could be at an increased risk: ‘Wherever they place him in theatre, the concern is it will attract fire towards everyone on the ground.’

He described Harry, who says he does not want to ’sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country’, as the ‘mother of all targets’.

Militia leaders claim photographs of Harry have already been downloaded from the internet and disseminated to the main insurgent groups in the area where the prince will be deployed.

Snipers belonging to Shia militia groups have, they claim, been ordered to target the 22-year-old while Sunni insurgents say they plan to hold the prince hostage to demand the release of prisoners and immediate withdrawal of British troops.

Together the testimonies suggest that Shia and Sunni paramilitary forces, traditionally sworn enemies, have joined forces to try to capture Harry, a deeply disquieting development for British senior officers.

Although some of the testimony may be bluster, there will be clearly be a concerted campaign to try to disrupt the prince’s tour of duty.

Abu Zaid, commander of the Malik Ibn Al Ashtar Brigade of the notorious Mehdi Army militia, said: ‘We are awaiting the arrival of the young, handsome, spoilt prince with baited breath and we confidently expect he will come out into the open on the battlefield.

‘We will be generous with him. For he will return him to his grandmother [the Queen] but without ears,’ added Zaid, a senior figure within the largest and strongest Shia militia group operating where British troops are deployed. We have printed out many photographs of him from the internet and given them to all other groups.

‘They know the prince is their main objective and I have every confidence he will be targeted and attacked.’

Abu Samir, a leader of the Iranian-backed Sunni group Thar-allah - meaning God’s revenge - added: ‘Our people are ready to welcome him in their special way - like Leachman.’ This was a reference to a British officer Colonel Gerard Leachman who was murdered by Sheikh Dhari, a tribal leader, in Iraq in 1920. Dhari is still considered by many Iraqis as a hero. While news of his death shocked the British public, it is credited with inspiring Arab tribes to revolt against Western occupying forces.

Samir added it would be impossible for Harry to avoid detection once in Iraq, describing his face as more familiar to Iraqis than world-famous footballers.

‘His face is now very familiar to a lot of people - more so even than Zidane and Ronaldinho,’ said Samir, a senior figure of the Iranian-financed religious party that set up offices across southern Iraq after the invasion.

Abu, a Sunni insurgent commander and former major in the Iraqi army, said that they had insiders supplying a ‘constant’ flow of information from within UK military barracks.

He said: ‘When they [the British] first arrived in Basra, we planted our people inside the British bases and headquarters, and it is these people who are now our constant source of information.

‘They have new orders to track Prince Harry’s movements. Once we have that information we will make appropriate plans to capture him. Wherever the British army decides to keep the prince we will find him.’

Another senior Sunni militia source said: ‘Plans [to abduct] are already in place. As soon as the prince arrives, the race will be on to seize him as a trophy and then to decide his fate.’

Such comments suggest that any hopes that Harry would blend in among the 7,100 British service personnel currently stationed in Iraq already appear misplaced. Among the thousands of pictures of Harry militias claim to have distributed are thought to include images of Harry on a battle tank during training. Others feature the prince fishing in Scotland with Prince Charles and Prince William along with images of the family during their annual skiing holiday in Klosters, Switzerland.

Zaid, who commands an arm of Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mehdi Army which has been responsible for attacks against British troops, said that if plans to abduct the prince failed then militias would try and assassinate the prince. He said: ‘Our sniper teams have also been issued with pictures so they will know his face long before he arrives in our land.

‘I would like to advise him [Harry] to stay at home among his friends. He should learn a serious lesson what is happening to British soldiers in Basra and I would like him to think 100 times before boarding a plane for Iraq.’

Last week two soldiers, members of the Queen’s Royal Lancers battle group, died after their Scimitar light tank was struck by a roadside bomb in Maysan province.

Ten British soldiers have died in Iraq this month, including two women, making it the worst month since the invasion. The total number of British dead is now 144. However, despite the deteriorating situation, Prince Harry will not receive extra security in Iraq. ‘He’s surrounded by a lot of heavily-armed men,’ said a Whitehall source yesterday.

Clarence House is being briefed regularly by the MoD.

One prominent member of the insurgency indicated that Harry might also be targeted by militias for religious reasons. Abu Ahmed, another commander within the Mehdi Army, said: ‘He should follow his mother, Diana, and rebel against the imperialistic family and not come here as a crusader, or his blood will flow into our desert.’

Although MoD officials will not comment on specific intelligence relating to threats against the prince, a spokesman confirmed that they were ‘monitoring security considerations on the ground’.

Experts believe the international media coverage towards Iran’s capture of the 15 British soldiers and Marines from the Shatt al Arab waterway in March will have underlined the value of taking Harry hostage. One Iraqi said that, if captured, the prince would be used as a bargaining chip to trade for captured Sunni insurgents and to call for the removal of British forces.

He said: ‘I hope we succeed so that we can negotiate the release of our brothers and sisters who are in prison as well as the departure of British troops.’

VISIT MY WEBSITE:

STEVE MCHENRY'S BLOG

Family Christian Stores


Amazon Unbox


Pocket Testament League

Survivor Mall

The UFO Store

Fingerhut



LinkShare

Firefox 2

BlogTalkRadio

Dara's Website


FeedBurner
Syndicate your Blog or Podcast with FeedBurner


Check me out!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Is the United States Still A British Colony?

RaidersNewsNetwork.com
Bruce Collins

I’m not one who easily embraces conspiracy theories. I try to keep an open mind though and I also do not easily dismiss beliefs. This causes me to want to dig deeper on a number of fascinating theories.

One of these objects of conjecture is the idea that the United States is still a colony of Britain. Before you laugh, consider the past and the present.

The Americans who arrived from England were British subjects. A subject owes permanent allegiance to the monarch (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914). The King expended his wealth to send his subjects to America.

The Declaration of Independence was a revolt for, in large part, taxation without representation. It was not a revolt over being subject to the King.

After the Revolutionary war was fought and Cornwallis surrendered to Washington, the Treaty of 1783 was agreed upon. You can ‘Google’ the Treaty of 1783 and find this document online. You’ll notice in the first paragraph that the King describes himself as the prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America. So, the Treaty was an agreement that granted more rights to the United States from the King.

Jonathon Williams, the nephew of Benjamin Franklin, allegedly wrote in his book Legions of Satan, published in 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington," a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown…the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire."

Furthermore, at the bottom of the Treaty, the three representatives of the United States- Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams- all signed their names as Esquires. What is an Esquire?

"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562

The representative of the King, David Hartley, was, obviously, also an Esquire.

In many of the articles of the Treaty, the King is giving up many of his rights in America. For instance, in article 3, the King gives the rights of fishing in America to Americans. How generous!

However, in article 1, the King has a claim to continue receiving gold and silver from his colony. How would he have the right to receive America’s gold and silver if he lost the war two years before in 1871? And, how is the King granting rights to the United States if he lost the Revolutionary war- unless there is some unseen agreement that happened to end the war?

Now, this is a very fascinating theory, which I found even more fascinating since reading Dr. Stanley Monteith’s book ‘Brotherhood of Darkness.’

Dr. Monteith has spent a lifetime researching clandestine societies who operate unbeknownst to the general public.

In a concluding chapter, titled The Final Secret, he writes," Professor Quigley discovered a copy of Cecil Rhodes’ ’Confession of Faith’ among Lord Milner’s papers. There Cecil Rhodes asked the rhetorical question: "

" ‘Why should we not form a secret society with but one object, the furtherance of the British empire…’ "

Was Hitler a brainwashed British agent? He was, says Greg Hallett in the book, ‘Hitler Was A British Agent.’ According to Hallett, Hitler’s grandmother was a maid in the Rothschild’s (interesting connection there) Vienna mansion. The story goes that Hitler’s father, Alois, was conceived in a satanic ritual rape.

Hallett claims that Hitler went to England between 1912 and 1913 to receive ‘training’ from the Illuminati. This trip is actually confirmed by his sister-in-law’s book, ‘The Memoirs Of Bridget Hitler’ (1979). Bridget reported Adolph was "completely wasted" upon his trip home from England.

As you will recall, in the Treaty of 1873 article 1 states that the King of England has a claim on the United States’ gold and silver. If you saw "America: Freedom to Fascism", movie producer Aaron Russo asks Ron Paul, one of the few politicians who gets it, about the gold in Fort Knox. Of course, most experts believe there is no gold in Fort Knox and that the Federal Reserve, a group of international bankers, has taken the gold of the US citizens. Mr. Paul confirms this and says that the Fed claims it is holding the gold for the treasury.

Russo also asks if Congress audits the Federal Reserve and Ron Paul answers that they do not. Then, Russo sums it all up by stating that the people’s gold may have been stolen out from under us and Ron Paul agrees that this is a definite possibility.

Who has America’s gold? Why did we purposely take ourselves off the gold standard?

Helena Lehman, pillar-of-enoch.com, has a good explanation of a theory that the antichrist is either Prince Charles or one of his offspring in her book, The Language of God in Prophecy. It is another sizeable column in itself but you can find an online explanation at this website: clydelewis.com/dis/prince/prince.html. I’m reminded of the statue that was built in South America for Prince Charles depicted as an angel with wings (fallen?) standing atop some skulls with the inscription,’ Savior Of The World.’

Jesus began his ministry at the age of thirty. Prince William will be the age of thirty in the year, 2012.

Lastly, I’m reminded of the conversation between Bush and Blair that happened over an open microphone. The media focused on the expletive dispelled by President Bush and limited the playback to about fifteen seconds. However, at the time, the entire conversation was available on youtube.com. You may still be able to find it.

Frankly, I was amazed that nobody else picked up on the entire conversation. At least, I never saw anyone comment on it.

However, if I can paraphrase, at the end of their conversation, Bush, with a mouthful of biscuit (literally), says," The MAN says that if Lebanon and Syria fall into place, everything else will fall into place."

At this point, Blair agrees and the conversation basically ends.

Who is the man who governs the policies of a joint British and United States operation?

VISIT MY WEBSITE:

STEVE MCHENRY'S BLOG

Family Christian Stores


Amazon Unbox


Pocket Testament League

Survivor Mall

The UFO Store

Fingerhut



LinkShare

Firefox 2

BlogTalkRadio

Dara's Website


FeedBurner
Syndicate your Blog or Podcast with FeedBurner


Check me out!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Share/Save/Bookmark